Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: iriver Recommandation
Re: iriver Recommandation
From: Rocker <rocker_at_shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:34:39 -0700
Sure but it is also going to be used more and more by legal downloads for
copy protection so why not support it if it is possible?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arnaud" <xcopy_at_club-internet.fr>
To: "Rockbox" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:46 AM
Subject: Re: iriver Recommandation
Why would one like to have DRM support in Rockbox anyway? DRM is a real pain
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:27:10 +0100, Ronald Teune wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:10:34 +0000, Bluechip <csbluechip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If we want to implement DRM playback in rockbox, we will have to check
>>> how the Iriver FW
>>> does it.
>> "Have to" may be a bit strong, but it certainly seems like one way in.
>Another way: h4x0r some rockbox code that somehow feeds DRM WMA data into
>a part of the original iRiver firmware, like linux mplayer, captive-ntfs
>and linuxant driver loader do. But that would probably cost quite some
Received on 2005-12-18