From: Manuel Dejonghe <manuel_at_dejonghe.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 00:18:37 +0200

On 4/5/06, Ronald Teune <rtwolf_at_gmx.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 April 2006 22:39, Manuel Dejonghe <"Manuel Dejonghe"
> <manuel_at_dejonghe.de>> wrote:
> > On 4/5/06, Ronald Teune <rtwolf_at_gmx.net> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 05 April 2006 22:03, Jens Arnold <Jens Arnold
> > >
> > > <arnold-j_at_t-online.de>> wrote:
> > > > filtering. It would also make it easier to add extra filtering
> > > > to suppress the spurious Off events with low battery on recorder
> > > > v1.
> > >
> > > \o/ all for it! Would give me back the advantages of rombox.
> >
> > euh ?
> > I can't get the connection between stray presses, low battery and rombox ?
> >
> > puzzled, lImbus
>
> rockbox.ucl doesn't have the problem, while rombox.ucl has it. I'm running the
> non-rombox since about december with no problems, it's fine as a temporary
> solution. It came somewhere between 2.5 and december 2005.
>
> See this link for a thread about it:
> http://www.rockbox.org/mail/archive/rockbox-dev-archive-2005-12/0052.shtml


geeeeez.
I remember.
And in fact, it's not that long ago that I bootboxed my recV1...

NOW I wonder where the technical relation to it is. Why should an
ADC-Scan from rom not be as reliable as from ram ?

~lImbus
Received on 2006-04-06