From: James Teh <jamie_at_jantrid.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:18:19 +1000

Ah, so this should definitely be configurable, then. :) Hmmm.

Jamie

On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:09:47PM -0500, Brandon Low wrote:
> Not a bad idea, not sure if it'll be 3.0 or later. The latency would be
> up-to the size of the pcm buffer. If you have crossfade set at 15s/15s,
> then that will be 17 seconds of latency in new sound settings.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Mon, 04/24/06 at 11:57:52 +1000, James Teh wrote:
> > Hi Brandon,
> > I could swear I wrote this in a previous email, but I can't find it
> > anywhere in my Sent folder, so I mustn't have. Apologies if you've
> > already seen this.
> > Is there any chance of either having low latency mode configurable or
> > disabled when a voice file is loaded? I know that low latency mode was
> > implemented to make sound settings changes respond faster, but I'd
> > personally prefer higher latency than no voice at all when changing
> > sound settings while playing audio. Also, how much latency would there
> > be if low latency mode was disabled?
> >
> > Jamie

-- 
James Teh
Email: jamie_at_jantrid.net
WWW: http://www.jantrid.net/jamie/
MSN Messenger: jamie_at_jantrid.net
Jabber: jteh_at_jabber.org
Yahoo: jcs_teh

Received on 2006-04-24