Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Anti-skip buffer question
Re: Anti-skip buffer question
From: David Pedersen <dav-ped_at_frisurf.no>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:59:48 -0400
To save as much battery power, and to save the HD the most, will it be best
to have the antiskip buffer set to max (7 secs)? Or, is there any better
setting, when it comes to anti-skip buffer and PM?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brandon Low" <lostlogic_at_lostlogicx.com>
To: "Rockbox" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: Anti-skip buffer question
> The RAM is filled with audio data, the anti-skip buffer is the minimum
> level of audio data allowed to be on that buffer before a refill is
> triggered. Thus you have that many seconds of the HDD not being able to
> read before the audio will skip, if you are shaking the player as it
> starts a buffer fill.
> On Thu, 04/27/06 at 09:17:12 +0100, Steve Bavin wrote:
>> Under SWCOCEC, I was under the impression that all spare RAM is used for
>> pre-buffering audio. Is this correct?
>> If so, what difference does the anti-skip buffer make?
>> Steve Bavin
Received on 2006-04-27