|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Anti-skip buffer questionRe: Anti-skip buffer question
From: Jens Arnold <arnold-j_at_t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 02:40:41 +0200 On 27.04.2006, Brandon Low wrote: > In normal conditions, you want the anti-skip buffer fairly > small, about 2x the length of time that the HDD takes to spin > up to ensure that the file buffer never runs empty during > normal playback. Hmm, the behaviour of the anti-skip buffer is still not quite correct on the swcodec targets. The anti-skip buffer is meant to be an *additional* buffer margin for when the unit receives some bumping while rebuffering. On archos it's implemeted like this. The standard low watermark is calculated from the spinup time (using a safe default if not yet available) plus a minimal margin, and the bitrate. The anti-skip buffer is added to that, and it's possible to set it to zero without causing skipping. The swcodec implementation should be fixed, imho. Regards, Jens Received on 2006-04-28 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |