From: Rob Powell <rob_at_rinty.plus.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 06:53:54 +0100

HI rocker, the .I suffix to all the models indicate that they've been
maximised for use in things like portable MP3 players, personal CD's etc.
There's a .p suffix too, which I think means that they're for studio use.
The Ir4's are the more expensive range, - I've tried both, and the IR6's
aren't that much different to be honest. There is a difference though, and
I've not tried them with an iriver MP3 player, which in my humble opinion
has much better sound reproduction than the Archos units. It's also worth
looking at the B&O and Shore (excuse the spelling if not correct), before
you buy. I bought a pair of IR6's, and didn't like them, and have settled
on the Senheiser noise guard 'phones, (the number is 300 but I can't
remember the suffix).

Hope that lot helps,

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se] On
Behalf Of Rocker
Sent: 04 May 2006 01:53
To: rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se
Subject: Etitmotic

Hi yall audio files out there!

What is the difference between the ER 6, the ER 6I,

and the ER 4?

the specs don't seem to be much different between them all but the price
between the two series is quite dramatic.



I want something with good Bass and treble along with superior isolation.


Thanks for your thoughts...rocker
count
Received on 2006-05-04