|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: source archive problemsource archive problem
From: Arnaud <xcopy_at_club-internet.fr>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 15:06:15 +0100 Hello, I can't manage to extract any of the recent build source archive. rockbox*.tar.tar ether with Winrar or with Universal Extractor. bw. it says, .bz2 where the download link to a .tar.tar file.... ??? I need to find an updated english.lang file.... What have I done wrong? -------------------- Arnaud de Bonald - Paris France - WeBlog http://www.echo-on.org Skype Netcava ----- Original Message --------------- Subject: Re: Playback Speed/Pitch From: Rocker <rocker_at_shaw.ca> Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 05:57:25 -0700 To: Rockbox <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se> >Dom wrote: >It is NOT possible to change the playback speed without affecting the >pitch (I.e. timestretching) at all. There is no 2% time stretching >feature in Rockbox, so please stop talking about. > >***Why? Do you have a Headache? This is not the dev's list so why do you >think anything related to rockbox should not be discussed? IN case you >forgot: The delete key does exist so if you don't like a thread, use it! > >Rockbox is an open source project. It's not a product planned in any >way to sell. If you like it feel free to donate some money to the >project. So thinking about what would make it better selling is >completely useless and of no interests to the Rockbox team. > >***Is that right huh? Do you speak for all the Devs? Sure the project is >open source but I think the vast majority of the Devs are interested in new >features that would place rockbox above the rest of the garbage firmware's >that come stock with supported players. I'll bet that all the core Devs >take pride in the product even though there not marketing it per say. > >rocker > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Dominik Riebeling" <dominik.riebeling_at_gmail.com> >To: "Rockbox" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se> >Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 1:54 AM >Subject: Re: Playback Speed/Pitch > > >On 1/6/07, Alexandre Enkerli <enkerli_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> Is there any way to increase playback speed (without changing pitch) by >> more >> than 2%? If not, is it a hardware limitation? > >It is NOT possible to change the playback speed without affecting the >pitch (i.e. timestretching) at all. There is no 2% time stretching >feature in Rockbox, so please stop talking about. > >> podcasts and audiobooks a completely different experience. If it weren't >> for >> the 2% limitation, it'd be easy to sell Rockbox devices as the ideal >> podcast-listening tool (what with bookmarking, etc.). > >Rockbox is an open source project. It's not a product planned in any >way to sell. If you like it feel free to donate some money to the >project. So thinking about what would make it better selling is >completely useless and of no interests to the Rockbox team. > >There is not 2% limitation. The 2% thing is for beat matching and for >that reason the 2% steps don't stick. It is NOT timestretching. It >also has the "chipmunk" thing (which might be not that easy to hear at >2%). > >> (Using a mid-December Rockbox build on an iRiver H120.) > >When reporting things please make sure to use a current build. Rockbox >changes pretty fast (at least sometimes), so reporting against a one >week old build may already be outdated because someone might already >have implemented / fixed the issue. > >As for your question: real timestretching is a lot more cpu intensive >than pitching (read: faster playback like Rockbox currently does) and >nobody has implemented it yet. Feel free to work on it yourself and >submit a patch. We have feature requests for time stretching (faster >playback without changing the height of the music tones) and the >opposite, changing the music tones without affecting the playback >speed. I'm pretty sure a lot of people would love such a thing. > > - Dominik Received on 2007-01-06 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |