Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Patch for iPod Video Playback needed or not?Re: Patch for iPod Video Playback needed or not?
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Jean-Philippe Monteiro <joaophilippe.mb.monteiro_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:19:28 +0700
On Monday 29 January 2007 18:04, Barry Wardell wrote:
> > Now, given the fact my iPod is returning 10fps, and that's the normal fps
> > on a 320x240 screen as quoted by the page while using the patch for
> > testing, do I have to patch at all?
>
> You don't have to patch at all. Using the patch is likely to give
> better performance though.
>
> > Will I have to re-patch each time I want to download a new build?
>
> Yes.
Thanks.
Received on 2007-01-30
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:19:28 +0700
On Monday 29 January 2007 18:04, Barry Wardell wrote:
> > Now, given the fact my iPod is returning 10fps, and that's the normal fps
> > on a 320x240 screen as quoted by the page while using the patch for
> > testing, do I have to patch at all?
>
> You don't have to patch at all. Using the patch is likely to give
> better performance though.
>
> > Will I have to re-patch each time I want to download a new build?
>
> Yes.
Thanks.
-- SuSE93 Linux Kernell 2.6.11.4-21.14 KDE 3.4.0 Kontact 1.1 Kmail 1.8 PHNOM PENH - CAMBODIA
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy