|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: FW: [users] Slow Monday -- No Bots?Re: FW: [users] Slow Monday -- No Bots?
From: Sander Sweers <sander.sweers_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:36:01 +0100 On 2/21/07, Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Christopher Woods wrote: > > > If I was in charge of a corporate network, I wouldn't ask my lusers to > > provide me with patches and bugfixes for the software running on the > > machines, because I was the one running it I would go and sort out any > > security problems myself, potential or otherwise. > > This is not "a corporate network", I am not "in charge" of it and this is not > a security problem. Who is in charge of the list? > Your attitude sure is rude enough for me to just ignore. Well there is enough attitude from both sides and ignoring is never the best option. I would like to know what your objections are to enable the 2 options he found for hypermail. They seem easy enough and imo every way one can fight spam should be used. I repeat them below. "spamprotect = [ 0 | 1 ] Set this to On to make hypermail not output real email addresses in the output HTML but instead it will obfuscate them a little. You can control the obfuscation with antispamdomain. antispamdomain = string with invalid domain By default the spamprotect option only does a small amount of massaging of email addresses. Use this to completely replace the domain from which a message originates (everything after the _at_) with some string to confuse screen-scraping programs. It is probably wise to make this an invalid mail domain. Greets Sander Received on 2007-02-21 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |