Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Why not Daisy when Doom? (was Re: rockbox Digest, Vol 20, Issue24)
Re: Why not Daisy when Doom? (was Re: rockbox Digest, Vol 20, Issue24)
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:54:19 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Dj Paddy wrote:
> Man! Relax! Doom was held up as an example plugin.
I'm completely relaxed.
I bounce on such claims because they're totally misplaced, outright wrong (in
my view of course) and they help spreading misconceptions about what's easy,
what's hard and why things are done the way they are in Rockbox.
Phrases sent to the lists are (ab)used massively all over, and unknowning
outsiders have no idea if you're the developer or I am, so they can't know
whom to trust or not. What's being said here will be taken as "words from the
So I ask everyone to stop making claims or wild speculations of what's easy or
hard unless you actually have invested some time and energy in the matter and
thus truly believe so as an educated guess.
-- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/Received on 2007-04-24