Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: Top-Posting, Vis-a-Vis Last Night's Fuss
RE: Top-Posting, Vis-a-Vis Last Night's Fuss
From: Stuart Lawler <stuart.lawler_at_visionline.ie>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:26:31 +0100
In the case of someone who uses Screen reading technology, it is in fact
quicker for the reader.
I totally appreciate and understand that this list has been set up by fully
sighted people and I want, wherever possible, to keep the few rules that
have been set.
However, I simply want to point out that from a usability point of view, top
posting is far more convenient for people using the afore mentioned
From: rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se [mailto:rockbox-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se] On
Behalf Of Jürgen Hestermann
Sent: 26 August 2007 21:27
Subject: Re: Top-Posting, Vis-a-Vis Last Night's Fuss
> Top posting is far quicker and a far more efficient way for people
> with Screen reading technology to read messages.
Quicker for the writer but a nightmare for the readers.
You accept that many readers get spammed only because you are too lazy to do
a simple Ctrl+A/DEL key sequence?
And how can Spam polution make things more efficient?
It's just the opposite.
Received on 2007-08-26