|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Kind of a rant on the rules, plus many thanks!Re: Kind of a rant on the rules, plus many thanks!
From: Dominik Riebeling <dominik.riebeling_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 23:50:00 +0200 On 8/26/07, Ed Nickl <pioneer4x4_at_comcast.net> wrote: > won't be replying incorrectly. As for following rules, I am all for it. I > will have to look up the "Rules" again and see for myself. I honestly > haven't read them since I 'assumed' they were typical to most email lists. This list in fact requires you to use a typical way of writing mails: a compressed, bottom-post style. At least in the open source "world" (and this includes every list I've seen for open source projects) has almost the same etiquette as this list. So this is in fact typical, it's definitely typical to technical lists. Correct quoting (i.e. only quoting *relevant* parts, not simply quoting the complete mail and bottom-posting!) speeds up reading and replying to mails noticably. The typical style for non-technical lists may be different. > person. I think it is only polite to consider how they read email. I know > I would hate to listen to an entire post just to get to the new part. hmm ... why do technical lists usually require you to trim the original mail to contain only the parts that are relevant? Sighted people also need to read (or at least skim) the quoted stuff to get the context ... It's similar the other way round: it's annoying if you need to scroll down, re-read the original (especially if it's not a direct reply to one of your mails) and then puzzle answers, that are given above, with the questions, that are given below. Doing this only by voice output, requiring me to remember everything (and possibly complex technical details) sounds really annoying to me. Top-posting is also called "Jeopardy-style quoting". I don't think I need to explain why it's called that way ;-) - Dominik Received on 2007-08-26 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |