|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: apologyRe: apology
From: David Hall <dmhall_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:39:55 -0400 Paul Louden wrote: > Christopher Woods wrote: >> >> >> I don't think people should've been called out on the list, > > The main advantage for reminding people on the list is that it makes it > clear when and how the rules are being enforced. This philosophy would be all well and good if it produced the results desired. I believe threads of this length prove the repeated behavior is not producing desired results and therefore should be ceased and a new method found to accomplish stated goals. > > Basically, doing things in the open means there are no cover-ups. > Your <snipped> anecdotes notwithstanding, I emphasize my point that if the definition of insanity is repeating behavior expecting different results, this method of rule enforcement is insane. Perhaps off-list discussion is not the answer - but (IMHO) clearly on-list discussion is not the answer. --Soap ------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox FAQ: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ Etiquette: http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html Received on 2009-07-15 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |