|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: unable to get latest version of rockbox to work on old V1Re: unable to get latest version of rockbox to work on old V1
From: Glenn Ervin <GlennErvin_at_cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:44:55 -0500 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Moore" <anonymous.jondoe_at_gmail.com> To: "Rockbox" <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:36 PM Subject: Re: unable to get latest version of rockbox to work on old V1 On Tuesday September 29 2009 5:36:10 pm Tom Cole wrote: ... Paul was right, you were being an asshole. Frankly, idiots like you and the others on this mailing list that *refuse* to follow anything resembling list etiquette or do the most cursory search of the available documentation have done more to sabotage the ability for this list (and associated archive) to be any kind of resource for the Rockbox project than anything Paul could have done. Perhaps you are unfamiliar, but other open source projects have mailing lists that are actually *useful resources* for the users. The users read the documentation, file bug reports, and ask questions *after* making sure that the solution is not immediately available via google or a search of the documentation. I think that the problem is that there is not a sufficient population of "good" users on the list to force the "bad" users to change. Instead, the few good users (Paul and others) get harassed by belligerent and ignorant "bad" users (you and others). The fact that Paul has remained on this list is actually amazing. If I were him, I would have bailed a couple of months ago when his "I'm not going to tell people that they suck at following the etiquette" thread garnered such hostile and unreasonable reactions. Given the inane and truly pointless quality of traffic on the list over the last 2 days (I'm thinking of this thread), I have been considering unsubscribing from the list. Reading this list is like reading USENET after AOL gave all of its lusers access to it in '93. MM --** Matthew, Although it is true that list ediquette should be followed, if it is demanded, I should point out that this is more of a user's list of RockBox, and the Developers have an actual list of their own for communicating about the developement end. So in my opinion, as idf it matters, this list should be more accommedating to the users, and that is essential, if the Developers want RockBox to be popular. Glenn----------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox FAQ: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ Etiquette: http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.1.0.447) Database version: 6.13370 http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.1.0.447) Database version: 6.13370 http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox FAQ: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ Etiquette: http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html Received on 2009-09-30 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |