From: Thom Johansen <thomj_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:32:46 +0200

  Den 28.08.2010 17:26, skrev Bertrik Sikken:
> Hi all,
>
> How was the currently used crossfeed delay chosen?
> Do you think it would make sense to make this delay configurable?
It was chosen by the guy who designed the algorithm, I just implemented
it in C and assembler for use in Rockbox and never really questioned it.
Making it configurable would be all good, I guess, but the assembler
routines
are already _very_ tight on registers and introducing further parameters
will
slow them down a fair deal. Not that I think this is a final argument
against
implementing such a change, of course :)

Thom
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
FAQ: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ
Etiquette: http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2010-08-29