From: Frank Gevaerts <frank_at_gevaerts.be>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 23:30:01 +0200

On Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 21:58:40 +0300, Borodin Oleg wrote:
> On 15.05.2012 17:18, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > I've had a quick look at this, and I have to wonder, why don't you use
> > rockboxdev.sh?
>
> I have a quick answer to this - you still can use rockboxdev.sh :)

I will, thanks. I just wanted to point out that tools/rockboxdev.sh is
our official way to build the crosscompiler, and doing things
differently may well result in getting a toolchain that doesn't work or
has subtle issues.

While of course people are free to use whatever toolchain they like,
encouraging people who don't know better to do things differently from
the official instructions can result in confusion and support issues.

Frank

>
> Oleg.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
FAQ:         http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ
Etiquette:   http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html

Received on 2012-05-16