From: Martin Steigerwald via rockbox <rockbox_at_cool.haxx.se>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:42:42 +0200

Hi Solomon.

I did not contribute to Rockbox wiki so far, so by all means feel free
to give more weight to opinions of those who did…

Solomon Peachy via rockbox - 28.06.20, 00:08:36 CEST:
> I use 'nikola' static site generator for my personal site, and already
> host a dokuwiki instance that is vastly more performant and stable
> than foswiki.
>
> All else being equal I'd prefer a static site generator, especially
> with my administrative hat firmly affixed.

I finally dug into starting my new webpage with a static site generator
and I have chosen Hugo. It is blazing fast. But it also has been
challenging to get some things about the them I created from scratch
just as I wanted them to be.

> (Oh, one other thing -- I want things to remain self-hosted, so moving
> to something like the github wiki is off the table as far as I'm
> concerned..)
>
> Anyone else have thoughts on a path forward?

I also worked with and know Dokuwiki. It appeared to be pretty light
weight and flexible to me. Back then when I last used it, due to missing
database, renaming a page could break links, but maybe that has been
fixed by now.

I believe both can work. And I agree something like Dokuwiki would mean
a lower entry bar.

Best,

-- 
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rockbox
FAQ:         http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GeneralFAQ
Etiquette:   http://www.rockbox.org/mail/etiquette.html

Received on 2020-06-27