Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Why not empty defines?
Re: Why not empty defines?
From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing <linus_at_haxx.se>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:45:58 +0100
Burelli Luca wrote:
> Question: why don't define cpu_boost to be an empty macro on targets
> that don't support cpu frequencies? That would make the code much more
> readable, IMHO. (This is just an example, there are several one-line,
> binary #ifdefs that could be swept away).
This is the intention. Those #ifdefs are mistakes.
Received on 2005-11-17