Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Xing headersRe: Xing headers
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Linus Nielsen Feltzing <linus_at_haxx.se>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:23:37 +0100
Bluechip wrote:
> Is there any reason why the Audio frame which contains the Xing header
> should be at the same sample rate (32K, 44.1K, 48K) as the main Audio data?
Yes. Many (faulty IMHO) audio players use the sample rate of the first
frame (which is the Xing frame).
Linus
Received on 2005-11-18
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:23:37 +0100
Bluechip wrote:
> Is there any reason why the Audio frame which contains the Xing header
> should be at the same sample rate (32K, 44.1K, 48K) as the main Audio data?
Yes. Many (faulty IMHO) audio players use the sample rate of the first
frame (which is the Xing frame).
Linus
Received on 2005-11-18
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy