Cam wrote:
> If there's a policy, let's see it, let the policy makers defend their choices.
>
They don't have to explain their choices to anyone and you're in no
position to demand that they do. They have no obligation to you or
anyone here. This is their choice to make and they've made their
decision. A little respect shown towards their wishes now goes a long
way...

Neon John wrote:
> I could accept the name requirement if it had anything to do at all
> with the quality or usefulness of RockBox. It doesn't. From this
> side of the pond it looks like nothing more than some guys who've
> found themselves with a tiny bit of power wielding it poorly.

Then how about accepting it out of respect for the founders wishes? It
is their decision to make, after all, not yours. Whether or not their
choice is meaningful to you at all is a completely moot point.

 From this side of the pond your protestations sound like no more than
sour grapes.

~ray
Received on Thu Mar 9 22:36:46 2006