Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: make the cvs build zips smaller?
Re: make the cvs build zips smaller?
On 5/3/06, Daniel Stenberg <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2006, Manuel Dejonghe wrote:
> >> Doing full/light packages will help the users who download packages, not
> >> build servers that create them.
> > Could the central build server not repackage submissions from such
> > slow-connected-servers ?
> It would somewhat defeat the purpose of the distributed builds to bring back
> significant work to the main server. The files that would be missing in a
> "light build" would still be target-specific so they would not just be an
> identical set of files to append to all packages unconditionally.
> > Or let the central server do the packaging only.
> The packaging needs lots of files that are created during the build so thus
> only a machine that builds for a target can package for that target.
Okay, I thought the biggest part would be the identical fonts, wps and such.
Langs, Rocks are indeed target-dependant.
> There's also this angle: the current script works like this and it seems like
> a lot more work to add work-arounds for build servers with severly capped
> upload rates than to just say that we prefer servers without such limitations.
> I would expect that many people out there have more than 200Kbit/s upload
> capabilities on their servers...
> And yes, I'm old and grumpy! ;-)
Received on Wed May 3 10:32:27 2006
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew