|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: make the cvs build zips smaller?Re: make the cvs build zips smaller?
From: Jonathan Gordon <jdgordy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 11:47:05 +1000 another reason to move lng and wps out of the zip is because even if ppl do use a different language from english.. they would only use one other file.. so y put them all in the zip.. sort of the same for wps... and fonts. can he lng's be moved to a seperate part of the dowload page? (have a drop list with the available languages, and another for the targets, then a button and it will upload the correct file to u..?) On 05/05/06, bk <mutualaid_at_gmail.com> wrote: > I did some quick and dirty compression testing today on an H120 build > zip (size is in kbyte, rounded to the nearest 4k): > > (original) rockbox.zip 2046 > (gzip -9) rockbox.tar.gz 1794 (12%) > (bzip2) rockbox.tar.bz2 1802 (12%) > (p7zip) rockbox.tar.7z 1297 (37%) > (rzip -9) rockboz.tar.rz 1738 (15%) > > Interesting that the bzip2 tarball actually came out slightly bigger > than the gzip tarball. This shows that with small files compression > statistics can get a little strange. Clearly 7zip is the winner, but > even then it's only saving 750k per build. > > Here's a table showing the uncompressed space used by each top-level > directory in an H120 build (this is /usr/bin/du output so there's some > rounding): > > 0 ./eqs > 1.3M ./wps > 20K ./docs > 3.9M ./fonts > 253K ./langs > 882K ./rocks > 588K ./codecs > 36K ./themes > 232K ./viewers > 0 ./backdrops > 260K ./codepages > 7.4M . > > Out of a total of 7.4MB, the binary and lang components take up 2.22MB. > The themes/WPS/fonts take up 5.24MB (~70% of the total). Separating the > two would be a big space/bandwidth win. > > bk > Received on 2006-05-05 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |