From: Joseph Jones <bumpycarrot_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:41:21 +0100

On 5/15/06, Anton Romanov <theli_at_ukr.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2006 13:05:21 +0200 (CEST)
> Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Paul van der Heu wrote:
> [...skipped...]
> > bugs are fixed after 3.0 but before 3.1 hits the road.
> >
> > And all these are my personal opinions of course.
> I totally agree! :)
>
> --
>

Why not call it, say, 2.9? That way it's admitted that the goals for
3.0 haven't completely been met, but we still lift the feature freeze
and show that significant progress has been made towards 3.0

-- 
Joe Jones
  -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
  Version: 3.1
  GIT/MU d-- s+:-- a-- C++ UL+ L++ E---- W++ w M t(++) 5++ tv D++ e+ h--
  ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Received on 2006-05-15