|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: 3.0 release announcementRe: 3.0 release announcement
From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 06:59:09 -0500 Well, the 3.0 is signifying that it's the big software-codec release. That alone should merit incrementing the major version number, I'd say. On 5/15/06, Joseph Jones <bumpycarrot_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5/15/06, Anton Romanov <theli_at_ukr.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 15 May 2006 13:05:21 +0200 (CEST) > > Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Paul van der Heu wrote: > > [...skipped...] > > > bugs are fixed after 3.0 but before 3.1 hits the road. > > > > > > And all these are my personal opinions of course. > > I totally agree! :) > > > > -- > > > > Why not call it, say, 2.9? That way it's admitted that the goals for > 3.0 haven't completely been met, but we still lift the feature freeze > and show that significant progress has been made towards 3.0 > > -- > Joe Jones > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GIT/MU d-- s+:-- a-- C++ UL+ L++ E---- W++ w M t(++) 5++ tv D++ e+ h-- > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > Received on 2006-05-15 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |