From: Bluechip <csbluechip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:54:08 +0100

At 12:13 15/05/2006, you wrote:
>On Mon, 15 May 2006 13:05:21 +0200 (CEST)
>Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Paul van der Heu wrote:
>[...skipped...]
> > bugs are fixed after 3.0 but before 3.1 hits the road.
> >
> > And all these are my personal opinions of course.
>I totally agree! :)
>
>--

So v3.0 will be released with "annoying" bugs ...deliberately.
If the bugs cannot be fixed within 4, 8 or 16 weeks
...what is to say they can be fixed be by v3.0, 3.1 or 3.2?

I know my vote will count for absolutely nothing...
but I vote ...do NOT deliberately release broken firmware as a
land-mark version.
It could be quite crippling if it got slash-dotted or some other publicity.

As for people installing "annoying" "buggy" firmware - well I suppose
that's just their own lookout.
I guess that there will be a big banner on the Firmware saying "This
is release is known to contain annoying bugs" ...or will we keep
quiet about that and just pray nobody notices?

BC
Received on 2006-05-15