From: gl <gl_at_ntlworld.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:08:15 +0100

OK, quick comment. Last I checked, playback still had some serious bugs.
To release a version with the _primary feature_ broken as a landmark release
is nuts imo - everybody new to the project will be turned off. I second the
idea that if you need to release something it should be tagged as
'pre-release' / '2.9b' or similar.

Another option is to temporarily revert to the previous playback engine,
which was much more stable (on the H1x0 at least)...

--
gl
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bluechip" <csbluechip_at_gmail.com>
To: "Rockbox development" <rockbox-dev_at_cool.haxx.se>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: 3.0 release announcement
> At 12:13 15/05/2006, you wrote:
>>On Mon, 15 May 2006 13:05:21 +0200 (CEST)
>>Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Paul van der Heu wrote:
>>[...skipped...]
>> > bugs are fixed after 3.0 but before 3.1 hits the road.
>> >
>> > And all these are my personal opinions of course.
>>I totally agree! :)
>>
>>--
>
> So v3.0 will be released with "annoying" bugs ...deliberately.
> If the bugs cannot be fixed within 4, 8 or 16 weeks
> ...what is to say they can be fixed be by v3.0, 3.1 or 3.2?
>
> I know my vote will count for absolutely nothing...
> but I vote ...do NOT deliberately release broken firmware as a land-mark 
> version.
> It could be quite crippling if it got slash-dotted or some other 
> publicity.
>
> As for people installing "annoying" "buggy" firmware - well I suppose 
> that's just their own lookout.
> I guess that there will be a big banner on the Firmware saying "This is 
> release is known to contain annoying bugs" ...or will we keep quiet about 
> that and just pray nobody notices?
>
> BC 

Received on 2006-05-15