Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: 3.0 release announcement
Re: 3.0 release announcement
From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:19:49 -0500
Well we still have until the 29th either way. What we need right now I think
is input on which bugs both in the tracker and at
"Release Critical" and then say "We release when those are resolved, and no
new critical ones have been added (or those that have are removed)" in my
opinion. I personally am alright with pushing it back, but there needs to be
a declared point at which it will be released, and in my opinion that could
best be handled by defining what IS release critical. A reevaluation of what
was originally defined.
On 5/15/06, Steve Moskovchenko <stevenm_at_umd.edu> wrote:
> I agree.
> Why not release a Beta version or something like that? Let's not be too
> driven purely by deadlines here. That is how we got Windows ME.
> A beta release now, followed by another week or so of bugfixing seems
> certainly reasonable.
> Just my $0.02
> On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 18:08 +0100, gl wrote:
> > I second the
> > idea that if you need to release something it should be tagged as
> > 'pre-release' / '2.9b' or similar.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v22.214.171.124 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on 2006-05-15