Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: 3.0 - What MUST be done?
Re: 3.0 - What MUST be done?
From: Dominik Riebeling <dominik.riebeling_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 21:55:37 +0200
just some side notes:
On 5/31/06, Sander Sweers <sander.sweers_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> A better way of organizing in my opinion for your release blocker bugs
> is to create a tracker bug named "[TRACKER - Rockbox release 3.x] and
> make all the bugs/features that should be fixed for the 3.0 release
> depend/block (i don't know how this works in flyspray) on it. Then when
> the tracker bug has no more bugs depending on it you can release.
As far as I've seen this the actual Flyspray development release
(which is running on the flyspray site itself, see
http://flyspray.rocks.cc/bts/roadmap) has a "Roadmap" feature which
seems to be something like the way you proposed. I'm not sure how safe
it is but the upcoming release seems to be pretty near (and, to give
an example, the Psi project (http://psi-im.org) also uses the
development version of flyspray), so upgrading may be an option (at
least when 0.9.9 is released).
> My thoughts on this are based on my experiences with other projects
> (Gentoo being one of them). They use a different tracker (yes bugzilla)
> but many of the organizational issues are the same.
Btw, Flyspray integrates nicely with dokuwiki which is a great wiki
for documenting code (which, imo, is a bit awful with twiki).
Received on 2006-05-31