Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: subversion
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:19:21 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, postmaster_at_diffenbach.org wrote:
> I heartily second this. Having used both cvs and subversion, subversion is
> much better in its features and more user-friendly.
There's no denying of this.
We've been discussing and intending to switch away from CVS for a long time,
and we all agree that Subversion is a better system than CVS. The question has
rather been if Subversion is the best alternative to CVS for us and for how
Rockbox is developed.
I have written quite a bunch of scripts and tools on the server(s) that all
are CVS-based and they would all require attention and modifications so a
switch will require quite an effort. No undoable, just a bunch of work that so
far has felt like I "ohhh eeeeh not now please".
And as a bonus: yours truly is involved and even has commit access in the
Subversion project! ;-)
-- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/Received on 2006-06-12