Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: 3.0 - What MUST be done?
Re: 3.0 - What MUST be done?
Now that the h300 battery issue has seemingly been solved, what else is
standing in the way of a 3.0 release?
On 5/31/06, Dominik Riebeling <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> just some side notes:
> On 5/31/06, Sander Sweers <email@example.com> wrote:
> > A better way of organizing in my opinion for your release blocker bugs
> > is to create a tracker bug named "[TRACKER - Rockbox release 3.x] and
> > make all the bugs/features that should be fixed for the 3.0 release
> > depend/block (i don't know how this works in flyspray) on it. Then when
> > the tracker bug has no more bugs depending on it you can release.
> As far as I've seen this the actual Flyspray development release
> (which is running on the flyspray site itself, see
> http://flyspray.rocks.cc/bts/roadmap) has a "Roadmap" feature which
> seems to be something like the way you proposed. I'm not sure how safe
> it is but the upcoming release seems to be pretty near (and, to give
> an example, the Psi project (http://psi-im.org) also uses the
> development version of flyspray), so upgrading may be an option (at
> least when 0.9.9 is released).
> > My thoughts on this are based on my experiences with other projects
> > (Gentoo being one of them). They use a different tracker (yes bugzilla)
> > but many of the organizational issues are the same.
> Btw, Flyspray integrates nicely with dokuwiki which is a great wiki
> for documenting code (which, imo, is a bit awful with twiki).
> - Dominik
Received on Tue Jun 20 03:45:50 2006
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew