|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: FlysprayRe: Flyspray
From: Mike Holden <rockbox_at_mikeholden.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:30:42 +0100 (BST) Paul Louden said: > Actually, if you look at my "New Forum Proposal" sticky in the general > discussion forum, I do believe one of the changes I would like to make > is to have two forums specifically for the purpose of discussing patches > (as an alternative to the comments on the patches at Flyspray, which > seem a little out of the way for the general public, and a better place > for specific questions from devs, and patch update postings). The idea > would be to still have the patches on the tracker, but also to have the > author post a link in the patch entry to the forum thread, and a link in > the first post on the thread to the tracker entry. The two forums would > be for "Plugins" and "Non-plugin Patches." > > Of course, these will only go into effect if I'm reasonably certain I > won't get chewed out for doing it, and there's still a large weakness in > the new forum proposal (lack of hardware specific forums entirely, which > resolves some issues, but introduces new ones since there are *some* > hardware specific questions). Since all patches are announced via an email if you are subscribed, I don't really see the point of this. If you want to follow up via email rather than flyspray, then simply post to the rockbox-dev list instead. THere's a lot to be said for followups to be kept within the thread on flyspray though, so they are all kept together. -- Mike HoldenReceived on 2006-06-28 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |