I'd like CVS commit access, but I don't know that I'd be much more
proactive than the current devs -- a patch /should/ a certain amount
of time on the tracker, to ensure it's "beta" tested.

That said, tooting my own horn, I think a couple of my patches are
pretty much no-brainers and if I had commit access I'd likely add them
(after the feature freeze).

Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Liberman Shachar (Lamed) wrote:
>
>> I don't know if this is some feeling many contributors share, but I
>> for once feel that many of my work, which I always make sure is worthy
>> gets left out of the main cvs branch, and not for a good reason but
>> for the reason nobody takes the time having a look at it.
>
> This is how it is and yours are not the only good patches that are still
> pending due to us committers focusing too little on patches or simply
> just not having enough time in our lifes. But it is also a matter of us
> focusing on getting a 3.0 out the door so there should be a focus on
> fixing the relevant bugs (only).
>
> Personally, I just haven't had much time for Rockbox for months.
>
> For anyone without CVS commit access who think you have what it takes to
> get it, please speak up and we'll take everyone into consideration. We
> need more committers.
>
Received on Wed Jul 12 21:12:46 2006