|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Flyspray severity settingRe: Flyspray severity setting
From: Dominik Riebeling <dominik.riebeling_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:39:10 +0200 On 9/18/06, RaeNye <raenye_at_netvision.net.il> wrote: > Dominik said: > > If someone starts working on a specific request, the severity could be > increased, making it easier to find them. > > Shouldn't you assign it to yourself instead/as well? good point, missed that ;-) > The important thing IMHO is to connect them via 'related tasks'. > Then we could have a script that finds closed patches related to open > feature reqs I just looked a bit deeper into that, agreed. It only needs the person who closes a task to give a bit attention to the "related tasks" field (which I didn't do up to now -- IMO this field is a bit too hidden). Maybe FS could display the number of related tasks in the overview at the top? Or, even better, the task IDs? > > If someone starts working on a feature request, that request could be > modified to a patch and its severity set accordingly. That would keep patch > and request together. > > But what happens when you only partially implement the req? same point is > relevant for closing the feature request... Close the remaining request and open a new one yourself, indicating that this was part of a different request possibly? Using two tasks for request and patch and connecting them is also an option, but I'm a bit unsure which is better. - Dominik Received on 2006-09-18 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |