Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: how should the settings screen work?
Re: how should the settings screen work?
From: Bluechip <csbluechip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:38:48 +0100
First off, I would vote for the "little-tick" option-set
However I would propose option 5
RIGHT = move tick; ON = move+exit; LEFT = exit; OFF = cancel+exit
but unless people think ^that^ idea is kewl, I suppose it's a vote
for user-configurable keys :(
At 11:10 26/09/2006, you wrote:
>ok, time to solve this once and for all...
>we have 3 (possibly 4) options on what each key should do in the
>setings screen, and I would really like to get a final answer on how
>it should work.
>1) like it was before actions. left and right both accept the setting
>and exit, off cancels and on accepts
>2) like it is now, off and left both cancel and exit, right and on
>accept and exit
>the next 2 options require lowlights patch which adds a little tick
>icon next to the currently selected option, but i cant find the link
>and i dont tihnk its on FS :( (you can see a screenshot of what it
>looks like _at_ http://users.monash.edu.au/~jdgor1/screeny.bmp )
>3) on - move the tick (i.e change the selection) and say in the
>screen, left/off exit the screen using whatever is the ticked option
>for the setting.
>4) LEFT cancels, RIGHT applies and backs out, SELECT applies and stays
>in the menu without any splashes at all?
>So, which option do we go for?
>OR, do we add an option to allow all 4 (or 3 or 2) of them and just
>argue about which shuold be default?
Received on 2006-09-26