|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: Rockbox Flyspray policyRE: Rockbox Flyspray policy
From: RaeNye <raenye_at_netvision.net.il>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:53:48 +0200 My scattered thoughts: >For reporters Bug - If the bug doesn't appear when using the default settings, please specify the non-default settings you're using. (maybe add the .cfg?) Feature, mostly for plugins - Note that providing a link to an open-source implementation for the requested application elevates the chances of fulfilling your request. >Severity levels High - add 'possible damage to data (e.g., filesystem)', 'crash due to a non-predictable yet avoidable (e.g., by using some setting) action' Medium - add 'crash due to a predictable action' We need to define more carefully what constitutes a majority/minority of RB users. Are ipod users a majority? A minority? What about ondio sp users? Moreover, most RB users wouldn't notice changes in codecs/plugins they don't use. >For admins I link duplicate tasks (via related tasks) mostly because some useful comments exist on either task, so that's my way of saving relevant discussion while closing the redundant task. Status - I usually change verified bug reports status to Researching and outdated bug reports with a 'please check whether the problem persists' comment to Waiting on Costumer. >Closing reports Maybe we should consider using the Later status for rather large yet obviously needed feature reqs, e.g., "implement USB-OTG for supported HW" or "optimize AAC codec". R. Received on 2006-09-30 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |