|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: rockbox-recorder-20061122 - volume representation messed upRe: rockbox-recorder-20061122 - volume representation messed up
From: Andreas Stemmer <groovingandi_at_gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:06:35 +0100 gl wrote: > > I had to remember that 0dB are 92% on the AJR20 > > and something else on the H340. > > It doesn't need to be. Just code it so that 0 and 100% always lie on > exactly the first and last values,. That's where the 92% came from as the Archos can go up to +12dB (100%). > > In the old Rockbox version, the answer was 92% (if I recall correctly). I > > think "0dB" conveys that information much better than "92%". > > Sure, but 100% for 0dB and (say) 110% convey it just as well. I don't think this is intuitive at all if it is not clear that 100% refers to 0dB. And you'll get other problems. You can allow values larger than 100% for players that have more headroom, fine. What about the lower end of the dynamic range? Where are the 0% for players with different dynamic ranges? Do you allow some player to go down to 30% only and others down to -10% or would you prefer a nonlinear scale where 0% is the minimum level of the specific hardware? If you choose the latter, 100% will be the only value for which the volume is the same for two models. In this case, headphones which sound fine at 70% on one model will sound completely different at 70% on a different player model. > Most consumer types would be happier with an inuitive scale. Most > audiophiles probably prefer dB or don't care either way. Perhaps it's enough to add "dB" on the display to make it clear? Andreas Received on 2006-11-23 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |