From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:18:04 +0100 (CET)

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, bk wrote:

> From what I understand, the initial conversion is not trivial.

The conversion from CVS to SVN is just a tool that needs to run for a while
(it collects what it thinks are single commits to CVS and commits them to the
svn repo one by one, so that when the tool is done the svn repo has serveral
thousand revisions), but there's no way to do it incrementally and it feels
like overkill to go a long way just in order to avoid a few days of
instability. I just don't think its worth it.

It will be me doing most of that work anyway, be it transitional scripts or
just one-shot scripts when we already converted, so...

-- 
  Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/

Received on 2006-12-22