From: Tom Cole <tcole_at_xtra.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:46:16 +1300

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:36:48 -0600, "Paul Louden" <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
wrote:

>Nobody has suggested that it be erased.
>
>The only suggestion has been that it follow the same rules as every other
>unsupported build, and maybe change to a less confusing name. It was an
>exception early on, but several things about the situation have changed: The
>fact that it has been updated with more patches, and the fact that we now
>have a guideline for unsupported builds.
>
>It won't disappear, and in fact it goes to a place where more people can
>more easily find it. All you have to do is get someplace to store the file,

I don't have a place to store the files, which is why I set up the wiki
page in March last year, after canvassing opinions on this list.

>and create a forum topic in the unsupported builds forums

It's been there since before that forum existed and was moved there by
an administrator when that forum was created.

>(please read the
>guidelines before you do) with all, or however much, of the content from the
>wiki page and you're done. No more than five minutes work and you're in line
>with the new system, and in a place where an Archos user searching for an
>alternative build is much more likely to find you.

I'm really not going to waste any more time on this. Do what you want
with the wiki page. I'm done.
Received on 2007-01-06