|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Optimizing plugin-shutdowns using threadsRe: Optimizing plugin-shutdowns using threads
From: Jonathan Gordon <jdgordy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:16:19 +1100 On 18/03/07, Timo Horstschäfer <mail_at_timo-horstschaefer.de> wrote: > Jonas Hellesøe Nielsen wrote: > > But is such a buffer hard to implement in the plugin API? I think it would > > be cool to implement it as a seperate function, with a name which indicated > > that it _didn't_ locked. > I suggest adding an additional buffer to ata_write_sectors as it wouldn't > change the API and is independent from plugins. > > -- > Timo Horstschäfer > > The buffer wouldnt be hard to implement, but pointless... The way its done now it means that not extra buffer is needed, and we can do more than just a simple write to a sector/file/whatever when needed.. With a buffer, only 1 (or a few) writes could be queued and there would be a articifial limit on the amount of data that could be dumped Received on 2007-03-18 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |