|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: "Estimated Runtime" feature.Re: "Estimated Runtime" feature.
From: Barry Wardell <barry.wardell_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:50:57 +0100 On 4/17/07, Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com> wrote: > How many people think this feature is worth keeping? > > I was talking in IRC, and I realized it's a fairly "weak" feature. > With all the various codecs music can be played with, and the > conditions under which it can be played, for the vast majority of > people the runtime is, if anything, misleading. > > As well, it leaves an option in our menu, the battery capacity, that > confuses many users. > > I would like to suggest that this feature could be trimmed. I imagine > it's a minimal gain for removal, but it does also remove some > confusion. > > But, I also know that I don't use the feature, and perhaps other > people feel differently about it. So, what say you: Any fans of it? Is > it useful and I'm just too thick to see it (very possible)? > There's also the fact that it's totally inaccurate on quite a few targets (PP targets at least, possibly others). Personally, I never use it and would be fine with it being removed. Received on 2007-04-17 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |