Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: [Spam][100.0%] uncommitable patches..?
RE: [Spam][100.0%] uncommitable patches..?
From: Peter D'Hoye <peter.dhoye_at_telenet.be>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:58:54 +0200
> So, during the cleanup week I came across lots of patches
> which I don't think are ever going to be committed (for
> various reasons), but some of them are fairly popular almost
> the custom builders and so I didn't want to close them so
> they can be maintained.
> I thought we should probably come up with what to do about
> them. My suggestion is create another group in FS for them
> (not a category, an actual group like patches, bugs,
> uncommitable patches). my reasoning is that just having that
> group doesn't mean we support the patch at all, but it does
> keep them in a central place, as apposed to having them split
> over 15 forums and wikis.
This was discussed on DevCon, and from my notes this was decided:
"Look at the unofficial builds and commit the popular ones".
Of course, hacky patches (bad implementations) should not make it, maybe
The question is: should AA wait until we have MoB? And those margin things
wait for viewports?
I remember this was discussed but don't know what we said about that. For
me, they could all make it now (if they are good) and then reworked once we
get MOB/viewports/... This may sound like double work, but it depends on how
far in the future the new stuff is.
Same goes for the REP btw...
Just my thoughts
Received on 2007-08-12