Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: lack of responsivenessRe: lack of responsiveness
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:22:28 -0500
> Why not buffer some (as in enough (tm)) seconds of the next song on the
> playlist?
We do, in fact we often buffer several whole songs ahead, but as you
near the end of the buffer, before rebuffering has happened (to save
battery it's not constantly filled but empties and refills), or if you
have large FLAC files, or if a user skips often, then you can still
experience a delay.
Received on 2007-08-15
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:22:28 -0500
> Why not buffer some (as in enough (tm)) seconds of the next song on the
> playlist?
We do, in fact we often buffer several whole songs ahead, but as you
near the end of the buffer, before rebuffering has happened (to save
battery it's not constantly filled but empties and refills), or if you
have large FLAC files, or if a user skips often, then you can still
experience a delay.
Received on 2007-08-15
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy