|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: RE: A question about internally used pluginsRE: A question about internally used plugins
From: Peter D'Hoye <peter.dhoye_at_telenet.be>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:28:29 +0200 > The "properties.rock" may be much more useful, and > incorporating it into core may be a good idea. Having it > connected to a menu is weird. The user may think that the > function is performed by the firmware instead of by a plugin. > I find this very important, and having it into core is, IMHO, > a very good idea. My initial version was incorporated in the core and then moved to a plugin because we agreed that this funtionality is not used on a regular base and using plugins as an overlay system seemed like a good idea to save space. When using dircache, it causes an unneeded disk spinup but that's a small price to pay imho. > I can prepare a patch to "disconnect" the plugins from > the menus, except for "shortcuts", which looks like a work in > progress. I'm sure that any patch that greatly increases core size will be rejected with pleasure ;) If otoh you have suggestions for other rarely used stuff to be moved to a plugin, please say so :) Peter Received on 2007-08-26 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |