Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Port of Mini-XML library to Rockbox: making progress.
Re: Port of Mini-XML library to Rockbox: making progress.
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:37:09 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Daniel Weck wrote:
> The cause is probably the underlying memory management logic (simulated
> dynamic memory allocation, currently borrowed from the Doom plugin). I am
> working on this and would be happy to get some help.
How much and complicated malloc do you need?
It might be time to drag in a complete malloc implementation to the pluginlib
so that all the plugins that want it could use it. It would probably make
sense compared to the current situation with a large amount of half-baked
implementations spread out all over...
I may be a bit biased here, but one alternative for use is dbestfit:
(I'm not proposing malloc for the kernel or core Rockbox, only for plugins
that in fact already do this but in a less "controlled" manner.)
-- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/Received on 2007-09-14