|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Port of Mini-XML library to Rockbox: making progress.Re: Port of Mini-XML library to Rockbox: making progress.
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:37:09 +0200 (CEST) On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Daniel Weck wrote: > The cause is probably the underlying memory management logic (simulated > dynamic memory allocation, currently borrowed from the Doom plugin). I am > working on this and would be happy to get some help. How much and complicated malloc do you need? It might be time to drag in a complete malloc implementation to the pluginlib so that all the plugins that want it could use it. It would probably make sense compared to the current situation with a large amount of half-baked implementations spread out all over... I may be a bit biased here, but one alternative for use is dbestfit: http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/dbestfit/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/dbestfit/ (I'm not proposing malloc for the kernel or core Rockbox, only for plugins that in fact already do this but in a less "controlled" manner.) -- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/Received on 2007-09-14 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |