Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: ColdFire-rockbox and GCC 4.2.1
Re: ColdFire-rockbox and GCC 4.2.1
From: Tapio Kelloniemi <spammi.helevetti_at_nbl.fi>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:23:25 +0300
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 10:06:21PM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Tapio Kelloniemi wrote:
> >I've been trying to build Rockbox for H300 and X5 using Gcc 4.2.1 and
> >binutils 2.18. As you may expect, I have not succeeded, and I have a few
> You forgot to tell us _why_ you did this and didn't just install the
> recommended versions? rockboxdev.sh should be easy for anyone to use...
Someone said (when talking about computers) that a fear of hassle is wisdom. I
use a Linux from Scratch system, and therefore compile everything from the
sources myself. I like bleeding edge, once compiled by system with CVS
versions of Glibc and GCC (will not do it again though...). I really want GCC
4 because I would like to play with Ada and Rockbox. Ada support in
gcc 3.4 is from the pit. Perhaps I'll try gcc 4.3 and CVS binutils next.
And Nils: Yes, I also want the patch.
-- TapioReceived on 2007-09-25