Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: building bootloader from source (h300)Re: building bootloader from source (h300)
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Daniel Dalton <d.dalton_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 08:16:32 +1000 (EST)
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, XavierGr wrote:
> On a side note:
> Last working svn bootloader I built for me and about 7 (IIRC) people, was
> r14945 (with added alarm support).
Does that revission contain any bugs what so ever in the bootloader code?
Like does it work with all the different hard drives or whatever?
Or has this bug been introduced?
If it worked fine for everyone, then couldn't we just find the rev that
contained the bug and revert the diff? Or look for errors in the diff?
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 08:16:32 +1000 (EST)
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, XavierGr wrote:
> On a side note:
> Last working svn bootloader I built for me and about 7 (IIRC) people, was
> r14945 (with added alarm support).
Does that revission contain any bugs what so ever in the bootloader code?
Like does it work with all the different hard drives or whatever?
Or has this bug been introduced?
If it worked fine for everyone, then couldn't we just find the rev that
contained the bug and revert the diff? Or look for errors in the diff?
-- Daniel Dalton http://members.iinet.net.au/~ddalton/ <d.dalton_at_iinet.net.au>Received on 2008-04-07
Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy