From: Paul Louden <paulthenerd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:05:44 -0600

Frank Gevaerts wrote:
>
> I think there's a reasonable chance that attempted 3-month cycles will
> turn out to take 4 months anyway (and 4-month atempts would take 5
> months), so I think staying with 3 months is a good idea
>
> Frank
>
>
Well, realistically, we'd be setting dates to start the freezes as well
as end, so we'd end up with shorter periods between releases, rather
than less releases. Under that argument it might be better to have 3 per
year, that way if the freezes run long, we still have plenty of time
between them.
Received on 2008-11-09