From: Will Robertson <aliask_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 12:15:16 +1100

On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Frank Gevaerts <frank_at_gevaerts.be> wrote:

> I think there's a reasonable chance that attempted 3-month cycles will
> turn out to take 4 months anyway (and 4-month atempts would take 5
> months), so I think staying with 3 months is a good idea
>

Plus, if we find that three months is too short a timeframe, we can always
extend the release period to four months, or however long we need.
Will.
Received on 2008-11-09