Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: ATA Ultra DMA on the PP5020
Re: ATA Ultra DMA on the PP5020
From: Alex Bennee <kernel-hacker_at_bennee.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:40:41 +0000
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Boris Gjenero <boris.gjenero_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm wondering how to proceed now. Is there interest in this, or is the
> current way good enough? Should I continue to work on my modified ata.c?
> Should I merge the DMA code with Rockbox with a minimum of change to ata.c
> and create a patch based on that?
I don't see a problem with going the fully refactored route if the
code is well documented and it makes sense that way. As others have
mentioned please post to Flyspray so we can see the code and
-- Alex, homepage: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/ CV: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/cv.phpReceived on 2008-12-24