Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Using gcc 4.4.0 to compile Rockbox
Re: Using gcc 4.4.0 to compile Rockbox
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Mark Allums schrieb:
>> Sorry, I wasn't clear. 4.0.3 *does* have the one arm-related patch
>> available applied. Stuff for sh or coldfire or gcc 3.4.x did not
>> apply, so I did not apply those patches.
>> 4.4.0 did not get patched, because it's not clear any apply. The diff
>> for 4.0.3 probably wouldn't work. I could "interpret" the contents of
>> the diff myself, and modify the corresponding file in 4.4.0 if necessary.
>> Mark Allums
> Well, apparently I was mistaken. If you can compile succesfully without
> these patches, they aren't needed (they are to make things work, so if
> it works, they're not needed).
I am not clear about this. Perhaps someone who knows what's going on
could time some time and explain.
Well, 4.4.0 doesn't work, in a sense. Rockbox is broken when compiled
Received on 2009-02-24
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew